2. The judgment of the defendant is found to be in an elderly and economically difficult position, but it is not only high to 0.268% of the drinking volume of the case, but also high to the quality of the crime, such as shocking the vehicle parked in a vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance due to the above drinking condition, and it has the record of punishment for drinking driving, and the court below partially mitigated the fine for summary order (7 million won) by taking into account various circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no special relation or change of circumstances that may be additionally considered in the trial, and there is no other special circumstance or circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and records of the case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, the defendant's argument is not acceptable since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.