beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.15 2015가단207579

토지인도 등

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the land in Annex 2, each point is indicated in Annex 35, 36, 37, 38, and 35.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 24, 2009, the Plaintiff’s legal relationship of real estate completed the registration of ownership transfer for each land in the separate sheet located within the land transaction permission zone.

From the previous point of view, the Defendant owned a container on the ground of the foregoing land, and occupied 636 square meters of the relevant site, including the same drawings as “B”, “D”, and “g”.

(b) Preparation of written agreements;

1. The defendant confirms that the above real estate is real estate within the prospective site for an urban development project under the basic urban planning of Incheon Metropolitan City in 2020, and the permission for an urban development project is in progress, and the plaintiff is a person entitled to registration

2. The duty of the plaintiff and the defendant (1) The defendant shall not engage in any act that may limit the rights of the plaintiff or cause damage to the plaintiff, such as construction of temporary buildings, emission of harmful substances, reclamation of wastes, transfer of the right to use, etc.

② The Plaintiff shall notify the Defendant of his/her intention to specify the above real estate according to the project implementation schedule at least two months thereafter, and the Defendant shall immediately leave the said real estate from the said real estate, at the same time, with due legal compensation under relevant statutes, such as the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc.

On May 12, 2011, the Plaintiff drafted a written agreement with the Defendant, which contains the following contents, and the Defendant’s aforementioned up to a certain point.

I agreed to use the real property without compensation.

(However, the other party to the written agreement was the name of the defendant C).

After the beginning of the year, the plaintiff was planned to authorize the implementation plan for 2012 and planned to start the project, and had the intention to promote the urban development project in the whole real estate unit. However, it is reasonable for the parent company to be detained in the bankruptcy affairs of the parent company.