When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be respectively.

around March 2018, the Defendant, at the residence of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, destroyed the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts, such as “D had 30 persons of Aar who live in the same dong-resident or had engaged in commercial sex acts,” and “D had 30 persons of D with 30 persons of Aare and died in a manner that she died on the roadside floor.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing legal statements of D, C, and E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Although the defendant's criminal facts are obvious in sentencing reasons under Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs, there is no violation of his/her mistake while denying the crime of this case.

Considering this point, since the amount of fine for a summary order already issued cannot sufficiently achieve the purpose of punishment against the defendant, the fine shall be increased based on Article 457-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant, and the sentence shall be determined as per the order.