In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

1. Defendant A

A. A. Around April 2013, the Defendant forged private documents at E office located in Donnam-do, Jeonnam-do, upon the Defendant’s request that a real estate lease contract needs to be made, the Defendant: (a) “Seoul-do G” in the column for the location of the site for the real estate lease contract that was brought into effect by B without being delegated by the Defendant’s wife F with any authority to prepare the real estate lease contract; (b) “Seoul-do G” in the deposit column; (c) “one million won in the rent column; (d) “Seoul-do H”; (e) in the lessor’s address column; and (e) “F’s resident registration number in the lessor’s resident registration number column; and (e) written in the lessor’s name column; and (e) written in F’s name and sealed the F’s seal affixed to the Defendant’s name.

When the Defendant came to know that the number of real estate, which is the object of lease, was wrong, the Defendant entered “F” in the column for the location of the real estate lease agreement in the same form as the latter, entered the following contents in the remaining items, and entered F personal information in the column for the lessor’s name, affixed F seal on the column for the lessor’s name, affixed F’s name and affixed F seal on the column for the lessor’s name, and filled out one copy of the real estate lease agreement entered by F as the lessor.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged two copies of the real estate lease agreement in F, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation document held that one copy of the real estate lease agreement, which corrected the leased object to “Seoul Dondondon I,” among the items mentioned in the preceding paragraph and the two sections of the F’s real estate lease agreement in the name of F, was forged to B who was unaware of the forgery.

C. At around 16:00 on August 3, 2014, the Defendant, who interfered with business, fell from F with the delegation of F, the E owner, at the second E-story accommodation located in Jeonnam-do.