beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.05.10 2013고단566

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2, 2013, around 01:25, the Defendant: (a) driven the Daz car in front of a restaurant in Gyeyang-si, Yangsan-si; (b) took the front restaurant as the front part of the vehicle in front of the said restaurant; and (c) completed an accident that damages the repair cost of KRW 1,976,00 for the said restaurant, the Defendant stopped around 20 meters away from the right side by driving more than 20 meters away from the e-mail.

After that, there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the defendant was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling in a large range of sniffing, booming red on face, etc., and after receiving a report, he was accompanied by the police box of the Yangsan Police Station, G and the above police box of the Yangsan Police Station, and was demanded from 01:55 to 02:25 of the same day to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately 30 minutes of the said police officer into a drinking measuring instrument for three minutes from around the same day.

Nevertheless, the defendant avoided this and did not comply with the police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

2. Around 02:50 on March 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) took the victim’s face at the above police box located in Yangsan-si, the Defendant: (b) took the victim as drinking the table who was requested to make a circumstantial statement on the background of the accident as stated in paragraph (1) and to measure alcohol from the above police box (30 years of age), etc.; and (c) took the victim’s face to take measures to return home after taking over the Defendant’s personal injury at the front of the above police box; and (d) took the victim’s face to take measures to return home after taking over the Defendant’s personal injury at the front of the above police box.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning drinking measurement and investigation, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Exemplary drivers;

참조조문