When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 25, 2015, the Defendant, while operating D urban buses operated by the victim C (46 taxes) at the bus stops in Yansan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 25, 2015, did not allow the Defendant to cut down the bus even though the Defendant had divided labels.

As stated above, it became a trial cost.

Defendant 1 got down from the bus and expressed the victim’s desire to do so one time with the floor of the victim’s head, and continued to boom the victim’s head with his hand, and assaulted the victim’s head on two occasions with his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for report on internal accidents (the part related to shots);

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s assertion on the part of the Defendant under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, based on which the cost of lawsuit is charged, is a legitimate defense, since the Defendant first asserted that the Defendant was a party’s hand-to-spath and flab as he did so in order to bring the flabage against b

Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant started to assault the victim's head at the time, and the victim has also been the defendant who did not set up a defense against this (Evidence 5, 21). Thus, the above argument premised on the victim's exercise of tangible power first cannot be accepted.