However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 24, 2017, around 23:50, the Defendant was arrested in flagrant offender due to the suspicion of assaulting the Defendant’s child against E ( South, 36 years of age) and one other, a police officer belonging to the Chungcheong-gu Police Station DNA, who was called out after receiving a report 112 on domestic violence, and was compelled to be transferred to the said DNA group located in 181, the center of Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheong-gun, 007, around 0:07, in the following day.

On September 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a disturbance, such as taking a bath while under the influence of alcohol, smoking tobacco, and intending to get out of the office; and (b) committed a string of the keys that was arrested at around 00:35 on September 25, 2017; and (c) considered the e-mail of the above E.g.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the CCTV verification);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution: Determination of a sentence in consideration of the conditions of sentencing, such as the confession of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the background of the crime, the degree of interference with the performance of official duties, the method and means of the crime, the records of the crime (one time before the last sentence of a fine), the age of the accused, and the