강제추행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant only fell off the victim’s left side with Australia money and buckbucks with the victim’s intention to commit an indecent act, and the Defendant did not look at the victim’s her tack with her hands with his intention to commit an indecent act.
Even if the victim returned to the defendant and returned to the defendant, the defendant had explained the previous situation, and had followed the same behavior, but he did not her her her her her but his her her her her her her butt.
2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자는 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서 “피고인이 갑자기 뒤에서 ’이쁜 아가씨가 뭘 이런 걸 묻히고 다닌데‘라고 말하며 휴지를 들고 있던 손으로 피해자의 바지선 주머니 밑 쪽 엉덩이 부위를 만지고, 뒤이어 손가락으로 거듭 엉덩이 부위를 만져 항의하였다.”는 취지로 일관되고 구체적으로 진술한 점, ② 사건 당시 촬영된 CCTV 영상 역시 피해자의 진술에 부합하는 점 등을 종합하면, 피고인이 공소사실 기재와 같이 피해자의 의사에 반하여 그의 엉덩이를 손과 손가락으로 만진 사실을 인정할 수 있다.
Even if the defendant, as his own assertion, took the above action to take advantage of the victim's body.
Even if such act objectively causes sexual humiliation to the general public and goes against good moral sense, and constitutes an indecent act that infringes on the victim’s sexual freedom, and in light of the method and form of the indecent act committed by the defendant, the father, the relationship between the victim and the defendant, and the circumstances at the time, the willful negligence of the indecent act may also be recognized.
Therefore, the fact-finding and judgment of the court below are justified, and the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. The appeal by the defendant is justified.