However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim C (ma, 58 years old) are married with a couple.

At around 14:55 on July 7, 2016, the Defendant, “E” in the operation of the Defendant, the wife population D, was in dispute with the victim due to the division of the property related to divorce with the victim, and the Defendant tried to divers down the victim’s bridge on the upper part of the bridge and the upper part of the bridge of the victim’s dilution, which is a dangerous object located on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to victim C photographs and legal chemical appraisal reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that his mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that the victim agreed with the victim smoothly, and the fact that there is no other criminal record except the fact that he has been punished once by a fine due to a violation of the Farmland Act) or above.