A. The parties concerned 1) The Plaintiff is a federation that operates a mutual aid association that accepts and processes the liability of the members for damages against a third party by taking over the liability of the members for the damages against the owner of a national truck. The Defendant is an insurer that runs an insurance business under the Commercial Act in the event the insured causes damage to a third party due to an accident during the insurance period. 2) The B Freight Vehicle B driven by Nonparty A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is a vehicle that was insured by the Plaintiff’s mutual aid association as owned by Nonparty B, and the Do Do Do dia (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) driven by Nonparty C is a vehicle owned by the Defendant’s automobile insurance product.

B. At around 20:40 on September 29, 2003, Nonparty C was driving a vehicle on the part of the Defendant and driving at the point of 2.9km (In the Nam-gu, Incheon) of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the traffic accident, and Nonparty C

)의 앞 범퍼부분을 피고 측 차량 앞 범퍼부분으로 충격하여 피해차량이 튕겨 나가면서 피해차량의 좌측 앞 범퍼부분으로 같은 방면 2차로에서 주행하던 소외 G이 운전하던 H 카렌스 차량의 우측 뒤 범퍼부분을 충격하게 하였고, 두 차례에 걸친 충격으로 피해차량은 500m 가량 그대로 진행하다가 2차로 상에 정차하게 되었다(이하 ‘제1차 사고’라 한다

B) (2) The Plaintiff’s vehicle driving on the instant road two-lanes on the same side of the said road was found late to find out the damaged vehicle which was parked on the same line and did not avoid it, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was shocked by the upper part above the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the upper part of the damaged vehicle.

hereinafter referred to as “the second accident”;

Nos. 1, 2.