2. However, there are extenuating circumstances to consider the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant still recognized the instant crime as a youth of the 20th beginning of the month and divided his mistake, the amount of damage is a relatively small amount, and the Defendant’s growth environment is weak.

However, the instant crime is likely to be criticized in that it steals money and valuables inside the vehicle or commits attempted crimes by opening a door on which the Defendant did not correct the vehicle parked, and thus, commits the instant crime, and the Defendant was punished by the larceny crime on January 12, 2017, and committed the instant crime again within the short period after the execution of the sentence was completed.

Taking into account the circumstances above, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.