However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 12. 21. 01:00 경 대구 북구 B 앞 노상에서 술에 취하여 택시 안에서 잠을 자다가 택시 운전사의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 대구 강북 경찰서 C 지구대 소속 경찰 관인 피해자 D(55 세 )으로부터 귀가를 요청 받자, 잠을 깨운다고 화를 내며 " 왜 깨워, 씨 발 이 짭새 새끼들 좆같네

The purpose of this study is to prevent police officers from performing their duties concerning the protection of the life and body of the people by assaulting the victim E (the victim E (the victim E) of the police officer belonging to the above C District called the victim D's knick and walking the mouth with the victim D's her hand, and facing the victim E (the victim E (the victim 43 years old) who was called together with D, when she turns home again, and when she turns home again, the victim E is drinking, and at the same time, he interfered with the police officers' performance of duties concerning the protection of the life and body of the people. At the same time, the victim D knee's knee, which requires approximately two-day medical treatment, and the victim E kn-kne's s

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A written statement;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (D), injury diagnosis certificate (E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (joint crimes of interference with the execution of official duties and injury);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence is that the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, has committed an assault against police officers and has inflicted an injury on them.

However, it seems that the defendant's damage caused by the crime of this case is not significant, the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case contingently, and the defendant's reflectability is considered as favorable circumstances.

In addition, in full view of the circumstances prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, sex, etc. of the defendant, the punishment as ordered.