When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On July 9, 2014, around 00:10 on July 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the property by removing the d taxi installed in a limited partnership company owned by the victim’s new company located in the victim’s new company, and the credit card settlement machine in his/her hand, so that the repair cost cannot be determined.

2. The injured Defendant, at the time, at the same time and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (1) above, was in conflict with the victim C (the age of 58) on the said grounds, and was scambling the victim’s head by her hand, and was scambling the victim’s head at several times. As seen above, the Defendant inflicted an injury, such as “influent loss, etc.,” where the victim’s number of days of treatment cannot be identified.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of witnesses E);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs taken by victim victims;

1. Relevant Article 36 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.