beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.06 2005고합54

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)

Text

Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, in the name of B and C, and in the name of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., conspired to acquire money by forging documents related to the deposit of KRW 1 billion around December 31, 1998 and KRW 600 million around February 11, 199 and deceiving a person in charge of loans in the said hot spring branch to borrow money as security by deceiving the lending of the said hot spring branch by forging the relevant documents. The Defendant conspired to acquire money by forging the official seal of the person in charge of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. to withdraw the said deposit by forging the official seal of the said person

A. On January 2, 199, 16:00, the victim E Hot Spring Corporation located in Busan Metropolitan City, B shall deliver one copy of the loan transaction agreement and one copy of the pledge contract in the name of the bank in charge of the settlement of disputes, which was forged in advance, to the loan manager of the above hot spring branch, and deceptions the borrower and deceptions the borrower. In other words, it shall be delivered KRW 400 million from the Dong in the name of the loan loan of the bank in the name of the bank in charge of the settlement of disputes.

1. At around 15.15. In the above hot spring branch, C, as if the agreement on loan transactions in the name of the Dispute Settlement Bank D and one copy of the pledge agreement concluded in advance, had been forged, delivered to a person in charge of loan in the above hot spring branch, deceiving the person, and, in other words, received KRW 200 million from the Dong in the name of the loan in the Dispute Settlement Bank Co., Ltd.,

2.8.In the above hot spring branch, the Defendant, in advance, delivered one copy of the loan transaction agreement and one copy of the pledge contract in the name of the Dispute Settlement Bank Co., Ltd., which was forged, to a person in charge of loan in the above hot spring branch, deceiving the person, and, in other words, by deceiving the person, who received KRW 200 million from the person, in the name of the loan in the Dispute Settlement Bank Co., Ltd.;

(b) The same year;

3.6.In the above hot spring branch, the defendant, in advance, issued to the loan manager of the above hot spring branch a statement of transaction related to the loss of the passbook in the name of G administrator, which contains the loss of the passbook in the name of G administrator, one copy of the deposit payment statement to request the withdrawal of the deposit amount of KRW 1,002,083,562, as if the deposit was duly formed, and deceiving the person to whom the loan manager of the above hot spring branch was in charge of the loan of the above hot spring branch, and