Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

A. During the Japanese occupation occupation period, G, who is a co-owner of the F, G, and G, located in the G, G, and Gyeonggi-gun, located in the Gyeonggi Yang-gun, Yang-gun, Gyeonggi-do, with a domicile in the G, G, and G, located in the G, Yang-gun, Yang-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, with a view to the 2400 forest field B (a change in administrative district and area unit; hereinafter “the land of this case 1”) located in the G, Yang-gun, Yang-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, with a view to the 2100 forest field H, Yang-gun, Gyeonggi-gun (a change in the administrative district and area unit after this change; hereinafter “the land of this case 2”), D, and I were assessed as co-owner by both Gyeonggi-gun, Yang-gun, Yang-gun, and I.

B. The Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership (hereinafter “registration of preservation of ownership of this case”) by the receipt No. 24890 of May 3, 1996, which was received on May 3, 1996 by the Government Registry of the District Court having jurisdiction over each land of this case after publication of non-real estate.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 2 through 5 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a clan grouped by Jmph 21 years of age K and composed of descendants, and is the owner of each of the instant lands. At the time of the forest situation in the Japanese colonial era, the Plaintiff held that each of the instant land title trust with L, L, andO was made to the Plaintiff, M, and N, for each of the instant land title trust with each of the instant land owned by the Plaintiff.

However, without any basis, the Defendant completed the registration of preservation of ownership of each of the instant lands.

The Plaintiff, a title truster of each of the instant lands, has filed a claim for ownership transfer registration based on the cancellation of title trust against the title truster, who is the title truster, of each of the instant lands. In order to preserve the claim, the Plaintiff seeks to cancel the registration of ownership preservation of each of the instant lands, which is null and void on behalf of the inheritors or some of the successors of the said

3. The lawsuit of this case is legitimate.