A. The Defendant did not insult the victims as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 2,00,000,000, and the cost of lawsuit) is unreasonable on the grounds that it is excessively unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On March 22, 2013, at the court of original instance, the following circumstances were revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below's determination of mistake. ① The victim F and G received a report to the D cafeteria of Changwon-si, Changwon-si at the time of the instant case at the court of original instance, and the Defendant was taking a bath to make the Defendant correct, and the Defendant stated that "the victim would have taken a warrant, sprink, sprink, sprink, sprink, sprink, sprink, and sprink at the time of the instant case, and the Defendant was urged to return to the hospital, and the Defendant stated that "the victim would have bit bit bit bit bit son, bit bit bit bit bit son," and the Defendant stated that "the victim would have taken a bit son's desire at the time of 20th day of the instant case and stated at the investigative agency or the police officer's statement to the same effect."