Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant worked as a company B in the company B, and upon dismissal from the company B, he used data, etc. stored in the company to use the complaint as evidence to use it as evidence for accusation such as related agencies.

On November 3, 2018, around 23:49, the Defendant stolen 5 documents files, such as 4 major insurance-related, subsidy-related, subsidy-related, youth transportation subsidy-related, worker leave support, etc., which were kept in the market where the entrance was not corrected by using any and all employees such as victim D, etc., within the office B, and the entrance was not corrected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each investigation report (with respect to the verification of CCTV images of a suspect's residence, re-specific and verification of damaged articles);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (referring to the confirmation of damaged articles and seizure of damaged articles);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for confinement in a workhouse (where a sentence of suspension of execution of punishment becomes invalidated or revoked and the defendant does not pay a fine);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that an agreement is made with the victim after the recovery of the damage and that the damaged goods appear unrelated to the monetary benefits of