The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

On October 20, 2016, the Defendants without permission set up a signboard “E church” on the outer wall of the said building through the signboard installer on the ground that the parents of Defendant A operated the “E church” in the said building, but disposed of the birth parents in mind.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to set up a signboard on the outer wall of the building owned by the victim so that the sum of 9.60,000 won of the signboard removal and paint work cost would be damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement made to the effect that the defendants set up a signboard on the studio building owned by the victim as stated in the facts constituting a crime in each interrogation protocol against the defendants prepared by a judicial police officer;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants: Articles 366 and 30 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act