When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 31, 2016, around 18:10 on July 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the Defendant and the Defendant, a auxiliary police officer affiliated with the said police station, to resolve the fare problem of the taxi engineer, and to guide the Defendant to return home; (b) “I send a taxi engineer, put the taxi engineer, write the taxi article, write the taxi article, sound, take a bath, and take a bath; and (c) assaulted the face of the above B by drinking, b’s b’s b’s b’s b face with her hand, and her b’s b’s kick with the hand floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The scope of punishment by law: A fine not exceeding ten million won;

2. Scope of recommendations based on the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria shall not apply in excess of the choice of fines; and

3. The sentence shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration all the circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, such as the following: (a) the circumstance leading up to the crime, such as obstructing the police officer from performing his/her duties without any justifiable reason, the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment; (b) the defendant has no record of criminal punishment; and (c) the age, family relation, inclination, etc. of the defendant and all other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case