beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.08.30 2017고단2210

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 2210"

1. On December 28, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents, using the fact that he/she was working at “E” in the Defendant’s operation of Pyeongtaek-siD, and prepared a new contract for mobile phone service that was found to be a customer and kept it, and applied for subscription to the mobile phone in the name of the above F, and received one mobile phone delivery.

The Defendant stated “F”, “G”, “G”, and “G H H H H H L L L,” and “enterprise I” and “B” in the bank account number column in the customer name column in the mobile phone “new service contract” column, and signed next to that column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new mobile phone service contract in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

From that time to May 29, 2017, the Defendant forged an application for joining a mobile phone in the name of another person, which is a private document relating to rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising over 13 times in total, such as the list of crimes in attached Form (1).

2. On December 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sent a forged new service contract as described in the foregoing paragraph to an employee of Pyeongtaek Telecom, who works for the Defendant’s operation in Pyeongtaek-si; and (b) sent a written application for subscription to cell phones in the name of another person, which is a private document on rights and obligations, over 13 times in total, from that time until May 29, 2017, from that time, from that time to May 29, 2017.

3. Fraud: (a) on December 2016, the Defendant: (b) in E located in Pyeongtaek-si in Gyeonggi-si; (c) in order to open a mobile phone, the Defendant was “existingly used” to the Victim F, a customer who was found to open a mobile phone.

When gallon, s4 cellular phone was purchased with heavy height and 50,000 won was paid.

However, the defendant focuses on the mobile phone purchased from the injured party.