2. In light of the favorable circumstances that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime even during the repeated crime period for the same kind of crime, the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims, there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, and all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, relationship to victims, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the instant arguments and records, such as the circumstances after the crime, are considered appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.