When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant worked as the head of the management office from February 17, 2014 to May 23, 2014.

1. The same year from around 09:00 on May 27, 2014 to the Defendant

6. 5. From the 18:00 to the 18:00, the following offices were informed of the dismissal for lack of work ability by the following offices: (a) by using the key, the dismissal of which was inappropriate, without permission, to the management office managed by the victim's autonomous council of apartments over 10 times; (b) by using the key.

2. Around 10:00 on June 23, 2014, the Defendant, at the above apartment management office, has impaired its utility by having and concealing one passbook of general deposit, one bankbook of long-term repairs, one book on the collection status of management expenses, one document related to the election for the representatives of occupants’ floors, and one document related to the election for the representatives of occupants’ floors, which is kept in the management office for the management of the apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. C Apartment collective housing management rules (type 8463, 2014, the investigation records of 129 pages);

1. Copy of meeting minutes (five pages of investigation records, No. 11665 of 2014), copies of each content-certified mail (6, 7, 9, 10, 59 of the same investigation records), notification of acceptance of reports on the formation of a council of occupants' representatives (24 pages of the same investigation records), corrective orders due to the violation of each Housing Act (34, 37, 40, 45, 48 of the same investigation records), notification of corrective orders due to the violation of each Housing Act (42,51 of the investigation records); the application of statutes to the Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act that prescribes the punishment (the occupation of a structure intrusion, the choice of a fine) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the claim.