Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On July 16, 2018, at around 20:35, the Defendant: (a) opened a gate for the operation of the Victim C (V) located in Seosan City B (56 years old, n) and opened, opened a so-called “hackner, prompt, inside, and going to the inside,” and hacked the victim’s right side hacking out of the outside, thereby harming the victim by assaulting him for about 14 days, thereby causing injuries, such as dump dump and tension, light salt and tension; (b) shouldered the hacks; (c) hacks and tensions; (d) hacks and tensions; (d) hacks and hacks of heavy resin; (e) hacks and hacks and hacks of hand and hacks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV images and a written diagnosis of injury;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserts that even though there was a string of the victim’s arms, the victim was not injured, and the victim was only forced to go beyond his own discretion.

However, according to the above evidence, it is recognized that the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as fluoral salt, tension, and tension, etc., since the defendant fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fru

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.