beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.08.18 2016고합63

공직선거법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant registered as a preliminary candidate for D party in the C constituency in the 20th National Assembly member election, which was implemented on April 13, 2016.

E is the supporter of E.

1. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant had the honor to conduct a public opinion poll at a closed place on February 13, 2016, using the function of transmitting text messages from mobile phones organizations, and using the function of transmitting text messages from mobile phones.

Even commercial telephone, the liquor tax shall be confirmed by confirming the commercial telephone.

It is rare to request a public relations with a thickness of the materials.

The character is written as "Isle public opinion poll and any candidate," and the character refers to "Isle public opinion poll and any candidate."

N. N. N., N. N. E.

The message sent to 97 persons, including election district residents, who answer “, sent the image file,” and sent group text messages to 466 persons in total five times in total, such as in the table (1) of the crime committed in the attached Table.

2. On February 15, 2016, the Defendant, using the mobile phone’s text message transmission function, captures Internet newspaper articles containing the following to the effect: (a) “The preliminary E candidate who declared D party member withdrawal horse in the area of the district in which the bankruptcy is faced” with the pictures of the prospective E candidate using the mobile phone’s text message transmission function, and downloads Internet newspaper articles with pictures to F where “the preliminary E candidate who declared D party member withdrawal horse in the area of the district in which the bankruptcy is facing the crisis; and (b) downloads them at the bottom thereof.”

"" sent a group text message to 95 persons, including the message sent to election district residents, etc., on a total of 190 persons, such as in the table of [Attachment] Crimes (2].

Accordingly, even if the election campaign period is not an election campaign period, the Defendant carried out an election campaign by spraying documents by a wrongful method in violation of the provisions on automatic broadcast communication restriction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (as to confirmation, such as the meaning of a telephone call)

1. Each internal investigation report (the details of the commencement of internal investigation, the attachment of a copy of an accusation case, the attachment of articles delivered by a person suspected of being suspected of being caught A, and requests for providing data for communication confirmation.