2. The determination of the Defendant appears to have been avoided from committing the instant crime due to economic difficulties, and the scale of individual damage suffered by the victims is relatively small, and the Defendant divided his mistake and reflected against him, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, there are many kinds of records of punishment such as imprisonment with prison labor, etc. for the same crime; the crime of this case is committed by the defendant by intrusion on a vehicle owned by many victims over a long period of time under the same number of laws as the previous crime, and the nature of the crime is not good, such as consuming the money acquired by disposing of it as entertainment expenses; the victims' losses have not been properly recovered until now; and other various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, environment, character and conduct, etc., it is difficult to see that the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.