However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the judgment.

From January 2016, the Defendants decided to use cash in the currency exchange machine of a derber, net, hat, Masc, lock, bank, etc. used for committing the crime, and colored a large number of unspecified number of figures with the currency exchange system, after wearing son and mother, Masc, lock, and locking the cash in front of the relevant currency exchange machine using drick, and take the cash in front of the relevant currency exchange machine, and the Defendant B opened the cash in front of the relevant currency exchange machine with drick after wearing her mother, her mother, mast, lock, and locking the money collected by A more than the network outside of the Defendant B, and shared the cash exchange machine of a drick, taking part in the scene, and sharing the role of the scene.

Defendants jointly and severally, at around 04:55 on April 16, 2017, in front of the Daegu Dong-gu F and the victim G’s “H”-based extraction store. Defendant B reported the outside network by wearing her cap, lock, and bags, and Defendant A entered the outside through an open entrance with a Make, lock, wearing a lock, and wearing an open door, and take approximately KRW 3 million in cash, which was put in the place after her opening, after her opening to the draber on the date on which the front of the monetary exchange machine was prepared in advance.

In other words, Defendant B was put into a bank, and Defendant B was put into a bank.

In addition, the Defendants shall take up total of 6.1 million won in cash owned by the victims during the monetary exchange period for four times, as described in the schedule of crime in the attached Table, from around that time to around 05:00 of the same month.

They have been in possession.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly stolen the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each written statement of E, I and G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigative report (Evidence Nos. 18, 19, 26, 36 of the evidence list);

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions regarding criminal facts: each of the Criminal Code.