A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of four months, Defendant C and D’s fine of three thousand won,00,000 won, and Defendant E.

To the extent that the defendant's defense right is not disadvantaged, part of the facts charged was revised.

F is the president of social welfare foundation G, Defendant A is the secretary general of H, Defendant C, B, and D, the intellectual disability rehabilitation facilities affiliated with the said foundation, and Defendant E is the employees of the said H, and Defendant E is the drivers of the said H.

Around February 8, 2018, F and the Defendants reported that there is a suspicion of abuse against nine disabled persons living in the above H, together with the personnel of the O agency and the staff of the K, Gyeong-si Police Agency of Gyeonggi-do, G, G, Gwangju Viewing M, and public officials N, etc., in the above H located in Gwangju-si, the F and the Defendants attempted to take emergency measures under the Welfare of Disabled Persons Act (Separation of abused disabled persons from abuse), from 12:30 on the same day to 18:30 on the same day, the F would prevent Defendant E from using the above H’s vehicle, and “H will be dead,” and “H will prevent them from using the above H’s bus and the police operation bus, etc.” Defendant E instructed his employees from blocking the entrance and exit by using H in accordance with the direction of the above F, and prevented the above Defendant C’s body from doing the above police operation.

Accordingly, F and the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials and public officials belonging to Gwangju Viewing Service on emergency measures under the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of Qua, R, L, and N;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, HH video CDs;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A and B who choose the penalty: Imprisonment with prison labor;