When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. From around 23:00 on May 31, 2014 to 23:30 on the same day, the Defendant and C were unable to avoid any disturbance by: (a) on the grounds that the importer and buyer of the trade name “F” operated by the victim E from the Sinsan-si Simpo-si D had taken money on the front of the entrance entrance in front of the entrance, and (b) Company C had taken a fluor of the said machine as a fluor of the said machine, and flusing the machine into a fluor of fluor; (c) fluor of the machine; (d) fluor of fluor; (d) fluor of fluor; (d) fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of fluor of f.

Accordingly, the defendant and C conspired with each other to interfere with the victim's business affairs by force.

2. Definite Defendant and C were able to take care of 20 persons, such as E, on the grounds that the Defendants were prevented from disturbance due to the circumstances and circumstances belonging to the Msan Heavy Police Station, which were dispatched upon receipt of a report at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), and the Defendants were able to take care of the said G and H, and the Defendant expressed that “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y. Mah Mah Mah. Mah Mah Mah. Mah. Mah Mah. Mah if she is himself,” and the Defendant expressed that “I Y Y and die. Mah Mah h. Hah h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.

Accordingly, the defendant and C conspired to publicly insult the above G and H, the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of 1, G and H to the police statement of E;

1. Articles 311 and 30 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;