If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car.

On May 20, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol at around 12:40, while driving the vehicle, and proceeded with the first one way in front of the D Company in Kimhae-si C, Kimhae-si, as a Han-do Myeon from the Myeong-do Myeong in Kimhae-si.

At this point, there was a center line of yellow solid lines, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle should not violate the central line in good faith.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty and received the part of the Defendant’s front floor in front of the left-hand part of the Fransh car driven by the victim E (the 52 years old) who was frighted in the course of business due to negligence going beyond the central line and going to the opposite lane for overtaking.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as a 6 cage cage cage cages, etc., which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

2. 도로교통법위반(음주측정거부) 피고인은 2018. 5. 20. 14:35경 김해시 G에 있는 H병원 응급실에서, 위 교통사고 담당자인 김해서부경찰서 경위 I으로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴에 홍조를 띠는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 그 때부터 14:55경까지 3회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았음에도 가슴이 아프다며 측정을 지연시키거나 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하고, 채혈을 통한 음주측정 요구에 대하여는 특별한 이유 없이 이를 거부하는 등 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1..