When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 25, 2018, at around 01:06, the Defendant: (a) sent to the scene after receiving a report from the Defendant on the 112 report that the Defendant was fluored; (b) stated that “A university was fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluored, fluord, fluoring the chest part of the above E’s

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are against the defendant, taking into account the favorable circumstances in which the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and determining the punishment as ordered in light of all the sentencing conditions, including the defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.