Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

No person shall lease or lend any access medium while demanding, demanding or promising the consideration.

Nevertheless, if the Defendant lent an account necessary for tax reduction or exemption to operate a liquor company by telephone from a person without his/her name at a place where it is not known on June 4, 2018, the Defendant would pay KRW 800,000 per day (80,000 per account) in return.

“On June 7, 2018, the proposal was received and accepted, and then delivered to the above person without his name, a copy of the physical card, which is an access medium connected to the community credit cooperative account (D) in the name of the person in question, to the address known by the non-person in whose name the card was sent, at the C office located in the G office located in the G office in the G office in the G office in the G office in the name of the person in question.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the consideration, sent the access media to the above-mentioned name in favor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the details of account transactions, warrant reply data, and Kakao Stockholm messages;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 49 subparag. 2 and 6 subparag. 3 subparag. 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the Selection of Punishment, and Selection of Fines (Considering that there is no particular record of crime, and that there is no benefit from the crime of this case)

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.