However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 12, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and KRW 3 million as a fine in the same court on June 17, 2013 as the same crime, respectively.

On May 13, 2016, at around 21:35, the Defendant driven a Cystent Gls car with a blood alcohol content of about 0.097% at a distance of about 100 meters from the front day of the restaurant “house with low transmission” located in the same Eup/Myeon from May 13, 2016 to the front day of the “day-to-day wedding hall” located in the same Eup/Myeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, and statement of the state of drinking drivers;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal history records, repeated statements, investigation reports (report attached to summary orders), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of one copy of summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Mitigation of discretionary work and mitigation under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (including the absence of any record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine and the absence of any record of punishment after being sentenced to a fine due to a drunk driving in around 2013);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Concurrent Consideration for the grounds for a suspended sentence);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;