수용재결서효력무효
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the “Central Land Committee” of 10 lines 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “Central Land Committee”. The Plaintiff’s additional assertion made by this court is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the additional determination under the following paragraph (2). Thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of
2. Additional determination
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff did not sign the minutes on which the Defendant’s chairperson and the members present at the time of the instant acceptance ruling, and the instant acceptance ruling is null and void since it was made without the Plaintiff E being present at the time of the instant acceptance ruling. 2) The seals of the members affixed on the instant acceptance ruling and each written ruling on its objection thereto are the same body and the seals of the same seal seal businessman were blind, and thus, the instant acceptance ruling is null and void since they were abused the seals on behalf of the members.
B. 1) According to the evidence No. 4 of this case’s expropriation ruling, it is recognized that there was no signature of the member E on June 23, 2016 on the minutes recorded by the members of the Central Land Expropriation Committee as of June 23, 2016. However, the defendant asserts that the minutes are prepared after the meeting and reported to the members present at the number of next meetings, and that there is no signature on the minutes, so it does not necessarily coincide with whether the minutes are signed or sealed. The statement of evidence No. 4 of this case’s expropriation ruling is insufficient to reverse recognition prior to the signing and sealing of the original written adjudication. The plaintiff’s assertion of this part is without merit.