beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2017.10.17 2017고단462

강제추행

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 8, 2017, the Defendant followed the victim E (31,00) to the toilet for commercial buildings in Da located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si on July 8, 2017.

The Defendant, waiting for the victim in front of the toilet, said that the victim was released from the toilet locker, and that the victim was able to take care of the victim, and that the victim was able to take care of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic data;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Where a conviction against the defendant is finalized on the facts constituting a sex crime subject to registration and submission of personal information under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “Sexual Crimes Punishment Act”), the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Punishment of Sexual Violence Act, and the defendant is obligated to submit personal information to relevant agencies pursuant to Article 43 of the Punishment of Sexual Crimes Act.

In light of the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of recidivism, details and motive of the crime, method and seriousness of the crime, degree and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s entry due to an order to notify the disclosure of personal information, thereby comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, occupation, and risk of recidivism, the method and consequence of the crime, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s entry as a result of the order to notify the disclosure of personal information, and the effectiveness of preventing sexual crimes subject to registration and protecting the victims, there is “any special circumstance that may not disclose personal information” provided for in Articles 47(1) and 49(1) proviso of the Punishment of Sexual Violence Act, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1

Since it is judged, it is not ordered to disclose or notify the defendant.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant was sentenced two times to the same offense.