병역법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On September 19, 2017, the Defendant was enlisted in the Army 21 Team located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and the Defendant’s residence located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, and (c) up to November 13, 2017, the Defendant was enlisted in the army as Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 541 Team, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gangwon-do
“The director of the regional military manpower office of the Chungcheongbuk-do did not enlist in the active duty service without justifiable grounds within three days from the date of call even after having received the written enlistment notice by e-mail.
2. Determination
A. The record reveals the following circumstances.
① The Defendant was present at the assembly of D religious organizations from the time of coming to the influence of his parents, who were the believers of D religious organizations, and was receiving education accordingly, and became the believers of D religious organizations on December 15, 2007. < Amended by Act No. 8817, Dec. 15, 2007>
Not only the parents of the defendant, but also all the types of D Religious Organizations are the believerss of D Religious Organizations.
2. After having received a d religious organization E, F, G, etc., the Defendant is present at two times a week at a meeting, is engaged in transition activities for at least three days a week, and is present at the meeting every year.
③ The believers of D Religious Organizations did not participate in wars for a long time according to one’s belief, and refused to participate in military training, military training, and arms, and thereafter, refused military service on the ground of religious conscience until many believers are sentenced to punishment.
④ On September 19, 2017, the Defendant received a written notice of enlistment in active duty service, and around October 30, 2017, submitted to the Military Manpower Administration a written notice that it is impossible to enlist according to conscience as a D religious organization, along with the written notice that it belongs to D religious organization E.
Since the investigation agency, the Defendant has maintained the intent to refuse military service on the grounds of religious belief while accepting the risk of criminal punishment.
(5) The defendant has no history of criminal punishment.
According to the defendant's school life records, the defendant's future desire to cut down at middle school was a good teacher, and it has continued to read the sense of D religious organization, and at the time of high school.