beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.19 2018가단17388

물품대금

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 35,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from April 27, 2018 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant completed business registration under the trade name of "C" and is engaged in trade and electronic commerce, while being in charge of sales of virtual currency as a Korean general supervisor of DLLC, a Chinese corporation.

B. On December 7, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) reported the sales of virtual currency extraction machines posted by the Defendant on one’s own blogs; and (b) decided to purchase KRW 45,000,000 for virtual currency extraction machines S915 (hereinafter “instant extraction machines”); and (c) remitted KRW 1,000,000 to the Defendant’s account deposit.

Then, as of December 8, 2017, the Plaintiff drafted a contract for the supply of goods with the following content on the part of the Defendant as “A (supply) D D Limited Corporation and B (Purchase) Defendant.” The above contract entered the Defendant’s “Korea General Director B” on its own pen and signed it, and entered the Defendant’s account number under its name. On December 11, 2017, the Plaintiff remitted the remainder of KRW 44,000,000 to the Defendant’s account.

- - He shall enter into and jointly comply with this Agreement through negotiations with Gap, in principle, on the basis of equality, resources, and good faith, on the basis of the contract laws and relevant laws and regulations of the People's Republic of China.

1) “A” and “B” agree to purchase the following products to “A”. The delivery method of the delivery method of the account transfer 3,000 set of non-S9 15 set of 3,000,000 45,000,000 account unit price (KSW) settlement method and 45,000,000 : The Korean delivery and underwriter: Plaintiff D E

C. At the time of concluding the contract, the Defendant explained to the Plaintiff that the instant mining machine was scheduled to be supplied by January 5, 2018. However, the Defendant explained to the Plaintiff that the instant mining machine was scheduled to be supplied by January 5, 2018, but was delayed due to the failure to supply the mining machine on the agreed date, but did not later delay.

However, despite the plaintiff's request for delivery of mining machines over several times, there was no delivery of mining machines, and the defendant delivered goods to the plaintiff on January 22, 2018.