If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

around 16:00 on March 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stolen the property worth KRW 116,000 in total on ten occasions from February 4, 2016 to March 10, 2017, including the theft of the victim E (37)-owned market value of KRW 10,000,000, which is the victim E (37) ownership; and (b) the Defendant stolen the property from February 4, 2016 to March 10, 200.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Report on internal investigation (to attach records on the extraction of images or photographs of CCTV suspects), and report on internal investigation (the suspected person);

24. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records of the extraction of crime CCTV images and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant’s confessions and reflects each of the crimes of this case; (b) the total amount of theft appears to be minor; (c) the victim is not subject to punishment against the Defendant by making a full agreement with the victim; and (d) the Defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime in this case; and (c) other all the circumstances revealed in the records and arguments of this case, such as the following: (a) the Defendant made a confession and reflects each of the crimes of this case; and (b) the amount of theft appears to be minor; (b) the victim is not subject