교원지위확인등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows. The court's reasoning for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is that "the provision of teacher's personnel management" in Part 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "the Regulations on the Personnel Management of Teachers", "(including partial numbers; hereinafter, including numbers)" in Part 6, 1, and 2 as "(including some numbers)", "the thesis book" in Part 8, 16 as "publication", and "the Korean Research Foundation" in Part 9, 8 as "the Korean Research Foundation", and "the Korean Research Foundation" in the part of the court of first instance as it is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment at the court of first instance as follows:
2. Additional matters to be determined;
A. Determination on the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff is based on Gap's 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 12 through 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 26 through 32, 34, 35, 38 through 41, 43, 44, 48 through 50, 52, 59 through 61, 64, 67, 71, 74, Eul's 2, 3, 5, 9 through 11, or Gap's 75, 77 through 80, 83 through 80, 90 through 108, 103 through 108, 111 through 122, and 14, and Eul's 14, which are alleged by the plaintiff as the ground for appeal by the court of first instance, and the appointment of the plaintiff is based on the plaintiff's general appointment of the plaintiff as the ground for appeal by the second instance.
(2) It is difficult to see that the Defendant interfered with the Plaintiff’s work of reinstatement and committed a tort, such as impairing the honor of the Plaintiff, etc., and it cannot be found any other evidence to prove it. Thus, the first Plaintiff’s ground for appeal on different premise is without merit.
B. Even if the plaintiff was not appointed as a general full-time teacher in the trial, the defendant is at least a special full-time teacher (general full-time teacher).