However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2013. 4. 29. 20:40경 성남시 분당구 C건물 2층 D 커피점 앞 계단에서 피해자 E(42세)로부터 “친구들에게 돈을 빌려 쓰고 왜 갚지를 않냐, 사기꾼, 인생 똑바로 살아라”라는 말을 듣자 화가 나 자신이 피우던 위험한 물건인 담뱃불로 피해자의 우측 관자놀이 부분을 비볐다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim by using a boat, which is a dangerous thing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on voluntary reports;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary work and mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the agreement with the victim, the fact that there exists no record of punishment other than the fine, nor the fact that the depth of the punishment is divided);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution ( normal circumstances in which reasons for discretionary mitigation are stated);