2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. On February 2, 2012, the Defendant is a legal entity operating a Tol University Stern Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); the network E (F) undergo a brain sewage terminal operation at the Defendant Hospital on February 2, 2012; the Plaintiff A’s father; the Plaintiff E’s mother; the Plaintiff C’s mother; the Plaintiff’s wife; and the Plaintiff D’s children.

B. On January 10, 2012, E was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on January 10, 2012, following the above examination: (a) the process of the implementation of the crypology removal method using the crypology approach Act; and (b) the process of the crypology removal method using the crypology method; (c) the Defendant Hospital complained of the cryp disorder and the decline in eyesight; and (d) the brain cryposis was conducted on the same day; (c) approximately 6.3cm on the ground of laying to rest and laying to rest; (d) approximately 6.5cm x 7.5cm on the surface of the Defendant Hospital; and (e) the Defendant Hospital was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on January 30, 2012 upon the recommendation of the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital; and (e) the result of the cryposis inspection conducted by the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital on the day of being hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on the same day; and (e.

3) On February 2, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital started 08:25 anesthesia with respect to E, and removed part of the species of brain sewage using the adjacent approach from 09:05 to 15:40 (hereinafter “the first operation”).

At the time of the first operation, the type of the medical personnel of the defendant hospital was measured with 1.6g/dL at 08:51, around 10:48, around 10.2g/dL at 12:36, around 12:36, around 14:19, at around 8:51, as the type of the anesthesia was with a high degree of blood distribution. At the time of the first operation, the clock was measured with 8.5g/dL at 14:19, and at the time of the first operation, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital included clocko 500c/c, as described below 4:

4) On the other hand, on the other hand, records of the operation for the primary alcohol (Evidence A No. 2-9).