A. The Defendants are corporations that manufacture and sell unmanned transport monitoring devices, and are enterprisers as defined in Article 2 subparagraph 1 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (hereinafter “Fair Trade Act”).

The Plaintiff, through 16 local police agencies under its jurisdiction (Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, Ulsan, Ulsan, Gyeonggi-do, Chungcheongbuk-do, Chungcheongbuk-do, Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do, Jeonnam-do, Jeonnam-do, Gyeongnam-do, Gyeongnam-do, Gyeongnam-do, and Jeju-do) to purchase 95 unmanned traffic monitoring devices from November 2005 to September 2008.

(hereinafter “instant tender”). (b)

1) From 2005 to 2008, the Public Procurement Service decided the successful bidder by means of a separate bid with regard to the purchase of the unmanned transport monitoring device from 16 local police agencies across the country. The technical inspection certification system introduced and strengthened since 2000, only the Defendants satisfied the qualification requirements for participation in the instant bidding. 2) The unmanned transport monitoring device is classified into a multi-functional monitoring device for violations such as speed (hereinafter “speed”), signal violations, traffic signal violations, vehicular traffic violations, and road violations (hereinafter “multi-functional monitoring”) and a section monitoring device (hereinafter “section monitoring”). The current status and status of participation in the instant bidding are as follows.

The present status of participation in the tender of this case shall be 1256,800 206,102325 on November 12, 2005, 2005 65,256,021 205,021 2301,410 2301,410 on November 3, 2005, 2005 1256,800 on November 7, 2005 1256,80 20020 206, 65,74,747, 208, 208, 206, 2017 15, 206, 206, 205, 125, 206, 206, 125, 206, 208, 206, 126, 206, 206, 208