2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The plaintiffs are the inheritors of E who died on February 5, 1995, and the plaintiffs A are the wife of the deceased, the plaintiffs B, C, and D. The children of the deceased.

B. From July 30, 1955 to March 11, 1957, the network E illegally buried and used the public waters located in Gyeonggi-do with no license, and submitted an application for ratification of the reclamation of public waters to the Governor of Gyeonggi-do (presidential area 9,604 square meters) on November 27, 1964, and the follow-up measures upon the above application were not taken. The network E submitted an application for ratification of the reclamation of public waters (presidential area 8,129 square meters) on August 12, 1965.

C. On October 5, 1965, the net E obtained the authorization of completion of reclamation works from Gyeonggi-do Governor No. 271 on April 28, 1966, when it applied for the authorization of completion of reclamation works in the area of 7,641 square meters (Yet G G 5,961 square meters, H 969 square meters, and I bank 531 square meters) of reclaimed land on April 2, 1966.

The answer of Gyeonggi-do G G G, which was approved for completion due to reclamation by the network E, was divided after cadastral adjustment, and the net E completed each registration of ownership preservation on July 17, 1978 among divided lands, with J Nos. 1,985, and K Nos. 3,690.

E. As to the above H maintenance, the Defendant completed each registration of preservation of ownership on July 23, 1990, and as to the I bank on February 15, 1990 (hereinafter “maintenance of H and I bank”), and the subsequent maintenance was divided into the land in the attached list Nos. 1 and 2, and the land in the attached list Nos. 3 and 4, respectively.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 4 through 12, 14 evidence (Evidence A1 and 12 shall be the same as evidence B 3 and 4), Gap evidence 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The real estate listed in the attached list No. 1 of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the deceased acquired the deceased's original acquisition by obtaining a reclamation license and obtaining a completion authorization. Although the phrase on the request of the deceased was "salin", the real property is until November 6, 1966.