2. Although considering the fact that the Defendant appears to reflect on the judgment, that some of the damaged items were returned to the victim, these points appears to have been considered in all the original judgment, and that there were several criminal records for the Defendant, repeated crimes during the period of repeated crimes, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.