However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 20, 2014, at around 01:00, the Defendant was required to calculate the taxi cost and to load the taxi by a slopeF belonging to the Masan Police Station C police box, which was reported D, because the Defendant was not defective in the E-cab driven by D at the Masan Police Station B, which was operated by the said police box.

Therefore, without any justifiable reason, the Defendant expressed the above F’s desire to read “I Chewing flag,” and assaulted F’s blaps by using flaps, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service: Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] Where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is insignificant (determination of sentence] imprisonment with prison labor for six months, suspension of execution of sentence one year, community service work 80 hours (including the absence of equal power and reflective power);