A. On June 8, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a building report, including permission for development and permission for mountainous district conversion, with a building area of 117 square meters and a total floor area of 9.75 square meters, on the Defendant’s 2,359 square meters of Kimcheon-si B forest land (hereinafter “instant application site”) in order to newly construct a light metal frame and a roof detached house with a total floor area of 117 square meters.

B. On June 9, 2015, the Defendant requested consultation on traffic safety, etc. to the Kimcheon Police Station and the Road Traffic Authority. On June 19, 2015, the Defendant received each of the following replies from the head of the Standing North Provincial Branch of the Road Traffic Authority on June 19, 2015, and the head of the Kimcheon Police Station on July 7, 2015.

In this case, the application of this case by the head of the Gyeongbuk-do branch of the Road Traffic Authority is a dual part of the main body, and the location of securing the Do road from the D bank might be somewhat reduced due to the installation of a low-speed speed lane, but it is necessary to supplement the traffic safety facilities of the central line due to the increase of the right distance at the time of entering the site from C to the site, etc., and to supplement the traffic safety facilities of the entire sections of the local highway. - In addition to the installation of the vehicle regulatory sealing in the eropibbing section of the eropic line - the installation of the eropic sign in front of the road line - the examination of the installation of the eropicing speed limit mark - the need for the re-fluence of the surface display and re-return performance test - the response of the head of the Kimcheon-do police station for the instant application for the establishment of the eropic line in front at the time of improvement of vision and the call.

On July 21, 2015, the Defendant issued a notification of non-acceptance of the building report to the Plaintiff on the ground that “the instant application in respect of traffic safety is likely to be invaded by the central line as a dual kacker section, and the distance for securing sights is short, thereby raising the risk of accidents.”

(hereinafter “Disposition of this case”). 【Disposition of this case’s evidence Nos. 1 and 1 of this case’s ground for recognition.