On June 27, 2014, the Defendant driven B rocketing car on June 16:27, 2014, and continued to run the two-lanes of the two-lane road at the 500-lane Do 500 meters away from the monthly rearrangement area, at the 500-lane Do, from the Dong, to the middle school.

At all times, there was a road with a speed of 70km per hour, and a crosswalk was located on the front side, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the steering employee by complying with the speed limit, making the steering gear well-being, and operating the steering gear accurately and operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went on the speed of about 109 km a speed exceeding 39 km a speed of 109 km a speed, and received the rear loading part of the victim C(the age of 82) driving c (the age of 82) driving c (the age of chilling on the right side from the left side of the crosswalk, as the front part of the Defendant’s driving car.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer injury, such as cutting the right mouth, which requires approximately 13 weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Each photograph, actual condition survey report, notification of traffic accident analysis results, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Selection of Punishment: Recommendations and sentence on the grounds for sentencing of imprisonment without prison labor imposed on Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act shall be imposed as per the disposition in consideration of all of the following circumstances (traffic crime group, general traffic accidents, Type 1 (Bodily Injury of Traffic Accidents), and Type 1 (In the basic area: April - October) and the following circumstances. Recognizing favorable circumstances: A favorable circumstances: (a) the victim is against: (b) the victim's negligence passing through a crosswalk may be deemed to have caused an accident; (c) the Defendant's driver is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy; and (d) the Defendant's driving vehicle has no record