In fact, even if the Defendant received money from the victim B, he did not have the intent to invest in the designated days of business, and there was no certain income at the time, and there was no real estate owned by the Defendant, and the husband was divorced on or around February 2007, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if he received or borrowed the money from the victim.

1. On July 20, 2006, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B’s house located in Ansan-si, c apartment 311 Dong 1702, stating, “The Defendant may obtain a large amount of profit if he/she lends 20 days to the Plaintiff for the number of days of lending the room to the son who attends a entertainment establishment.”

On July 27, 2006, the Defendant received 70,000,000 won including the sum of 45,000,000,000 won under the pretext of a loan, and around October 13, 2006, the Defendant received 11,00,000,000 won under the pretext of an investment in the project for the number of days from the victim’s seat, and acquired 59,00,000 won under the pretext of an investment in the project for the number of days.

2. On July 25, 2007, at the victim B’s house as stated in paragraph (1) around July 25, 2007, the Defendant stated that the facts did not have real estate owned by the Defendant, and did not enter rental income from Ansan City. Although the so-called D’s agent of Defendant’s operation was not relieved of deficit, the Defendant borrowed money for the Defendant to pay the annual business income tax to the Defendant at the time of sales, and the Defendant did not dispose of the real estate in Korea, and thus, it is necessary to pay the rent at the time of Ansan City.”

The defendant acquired 10,000,000 won from the victim's seat from the victim.

3. The defendant is the victim B as described in paragraph (1) around August 2, 2007.