A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A worked as the representative director of G Co., Ltd. from February 2, 2009 to December 201, 2010, and around April 11, 2013, P Co., Ltd. was present at the appellate court judgment (Seoul High Court Decision 2012Na75736, Sept. 12, 2013, 201), which was brought against the instant company and the Korea Railroad Corporation by the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul High Court Decision 2012Na75736, Sept. 12, 2013) to take an oath under the law. A.

At the time of the above claim for damages, the defendant asked that the J attorney-at-law, an agent of the plaintiff company, requested the witness to receive the actual payment from the plaintiff company at the time of the above claim for damages. The witness asked that the witness failed to do so. The witness asked the question that the agreement was already completed on May 19, 2009 between the chairperson who is a major shareholder of the company of this case and the company of this case. Thus, the 11 billion won of the plaintiff company's assertion was stated in the share certificate security agreement that was already deposited in the company of this case as of May 19, 2009. The witness asked that there was no explanation, and that there was no explanation, and that the preparation of the contract was delayed between the plaintiff company and the company of this case as the issue of the actual payment receipt, and that the witness did not answer the question that the business itself can be suspended if the audit of this case was made.

However, there was a fact that J attorney demanded a receipt from the defendant as a result of the request that the defendant state that the defendant would make the "take-out" in the lease contract, and in fact there was a fact that such statement was actually harmed.

B. In relation to the submission of a written confirmation, the Defendant’s perjury witness to the Plaintiff’s attorney at the instant case.