beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.09.20 2017고단825

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 18, 2009, the criminal defendant against the victim C (D) borrowed money from the victim C (D) house of the victim C (D) who was in know of around March 18, 2009, to the victim who was in know of the victim C (D) E, only three million won since he/she got out of the fraternity in order to ensure that the person escaping from the fraternity is in need of money.

8. shall be repaid up to 15.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use part of the fraternity that the defendant operated at the time for the purpose of resolving money from the victim who failed to properly manage the fraternity. There was no property or income in the future of the defendant. The defendant knew that it is difficult to receive money from the above F due to the reason that the circumstances of F that the defendant lent money, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the money properly.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 3 million from the injured party on the same day on the same day, and received a total of KRW 11 million from the injured party four times from the time to June 29, 2009, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. The criminal defendant against the victim G was operated by the defendant who was in the voice group H in around April 20, 2009.

I In the cafeteria, I would lend money to the victim G who was aware of and known to the cafeteria within three months of the lending of money to the cafeteria materials to the victim G.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, the facts indicate that the Defendant received money from the injured party, and there was no property or income in the future of the Defendant. At the time, the above restaurant that the Defendant started to operate after the F from the F did not have any customer, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, the Defendant is willing to pay the money properly.