However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around September 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating, “If a director is required to be appointed, the Defendant would receive a house deposit which currently resides, and would have to be repaid, if only KRW 10,000,000,00 is lent to the victim C in the Defendant’s residence located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.”

However, even if the defendant receives the deposit, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money to the victim as he promised to have the defendant covered by the living expenses and various public charges.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made such false statements to the victim and received KRW 10,000,000 from the victim’s place of residence.

2. On November 29, 2012, the Defendant concluded that the Defendant stated that “the body is in need of KRW 1,000,000 at the Apum Hospital’s expense” to the victim of the Etel 1304 in front of the Jeju-gu Jejuananandong State Station. On the loan, the Defendant would receive hospitalized treatment and complete payment of insurance proceeds.”

However, the Defendant was thought to cover the above money for living expenses and did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 1,00,000 won from the victim’s place of residence by making such false statement to the victim.

3. Around December 14, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The Defendant would lend KRW 2,300,000 to the victim an advertising board for propaganda purposes for one year in the subwayam, Jeju-gu, Incheon-gu history.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the above money with the advertising board installed or borrowed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 2,300,000 won from the victim’s place of residence by making such false statement to the victim.

4. The Defendant, on February 15, 2013, falsely stating that “Around February 15, 2013, the victim would incur KRW 3,000,000 at the expense of reducing the performance of the contract” (hereinafter “the performance of the contract”) from the victim.